Comments for Juhu Kinners http://juhukinners.com Fabian Jakobs - Bringing the Desktop to the Browser Thu, 18 Mar 2010 00:15:00 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 Comment on ‘typeof’ considered useless - or how to write robust type checks by typeof vs instanceof - LA.NET [EN] http://juhukinners.com/2009/01/11/typeof-considered-useless-or-how-to-write-robust-type-checks/#comment-35 typeof vs instanceof - LA.NET [EN] Sat, 19 Sep 2009 13:26:52 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=63#comment-35 [...] you’re using a “primitive” number). After running a quick search, I was able to get a good compilation of values that are returned from this method. As you can see from that list, this is probably one [...] [...] you’re using a “primitive” number). After running a quick search, I was able to get a good compilation of values that are returned from this method. As you can see from that list, this is probably one [...]

]]> Comment on qooxdoo in the c’t by Me, myself and I http://juhukinners.com/2008/12/23/qooxdoo-in-the-ct/#comment-34 Me, myself and I Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:52:27 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=14#comment-34 <blockquote cite="#commentbody-8"> If you start a qooxdoo project make sure you subscribe to the mailing list. Its our number one support channel. </blockquote> Quite an impressive support channel, I'd say. very fast and very friendly, even with noobs asking stupid questions (like me).

If you start a qooxdoo project make sure you subscribe to the mailing list. Its our number one support channel.

Quite an impressive support channel, I’d say. very fast and very friendly, even with noobs asking stupid questions (like me).

]]> Comment on Travel Hack Session Diary by admin http://juhukinners.com/2009/04/02/travel-hack-session-diary/#comment-23 admin Fri, 03 Apr 2009 15:22:54 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=88#comment-23 not yet but it's on my list. not yet but it’s on my list.

]]> Comment on Travel Hack Session Diary by Thomas http://juhukinners.com/2009/04/02/travel-hack-session-diary/#comment-22 Thomas Fri, 03 Apr 2009 14:42:52 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=88#comment-22 Hi Fabian, nice report. You're linking to Neal Ford's blog - have you actually read the Productive Programmer? Hi Fabian,
nice report. You’re linking to Neal Ford’s blog - have you actually read the Productive Programmer?

]]> Comment on ‘typeof’ considered useless - or how to write robust type checks by qooxdoo » News » The week in qooxdoo (2009-20-20) http://juhukinners.com/2009/01/11/typeof-considered-useless-or-how-to-write-robust-type-checks/#comment-20 qooxdoo » News » The week in qooxdoo (2009-20-20) Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:38:55 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=63#comment-20 [...] checks in JavaScript are surprisingly hard to get right. To solve this issue on a framework level we have introduced the qx.lang.Type utility class, which [...] [...] checks in JavaScript are surprisingly hard to get right. To solve this issue on a framework level we have introduced the qx.lang.Type utility class, which [...]

]]> Comment on ‘typeof’ considered useless - or how to write robust type checks by admin http://juhukinners.com/2009/01/11/typeof-considered-useless-or-how-to-write-robust-type-checks/#comment-12 admin Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:17:41 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=63#comment-12 Absolutely. I have a general getClass method in mind, which uses a map lookup instead of the slice and a couple of isArray, isString, ... functions, which compare to the full string. Similar to the solution in jQuery (see link in the article). Absolutely. I have a general getClass method in mind, which uses a map lookup instead of the slice and a couple of isArray, isString, … functions, which compare to the full string. Similar to the solution in jQuery (see link in the article).

]]> Comment on ‘typeof’ considered useless - or how to write robust type checks by Sebastian http://juhukinners.com/2009/01/11/typeof-considered-useless-or-how-to-write-robust-type-checks/#comment-11 Sebastian Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:25:17 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=63#comment-11 As the native toString might be limited to these 9 types a map lookup may be faster than the slice. Especially by many uses. Especially would like this in the type checks of the property system in qooxdoo. As the native toString might be limited to these 9 types a map lookup may be faster than the slice. Especially by many uses. Especially would like this in the type checks of the property system in qooxdoo.

]]> Comment on ‘typeof’ considered useless - or how to write robust type checks by admin http://juhukinners.com/2009/01/11/typeof-considered-useless-or-how-to-write-robust-type-checks/#comment-10 admin Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:01:08 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=63#comment-10 Yes I think we can and should make use of this in qooxdoo. Yes I think we can and should make use of this in qooxdoo.

]]> Comment on ‘typeof’ considered useless - or how to write robust type checks by Martin http://juhukinners.com/2009/01/11/typeof-considered-useless-or-how-to-write-robust-type-checks/#comment-9 Martin Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:53:07 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=63#comment-9 Looks realy interessting! Do you think this could make its way to the qooxdoo framework? Could be interessting for the current implementation of the inspector. Looks realy interessting! Do you think this could make its way to the qooxdoo framework? Could be interessting for the current implementation of the inspector.

]]> Comment on qooxdoo in the c’t by admin http://juhukinners.com/2008/12/23/qooxdoo-in-the-ct/#comment-8 admin Mon, 05 Jan 2009 11:18:11 +0000 http://juhukinners.com/?p=14#comment-8 Hi Roman, I'm happy you liked the article. The similarity to Qt is no coincidence. Especially for the 0.8 release we have borrowed heavily concepts from Qt. If you start a qooxdoo project make sure you subscribe to the mailing list. Its our number one support channel. Hi Roman,
I’m happy you liked the article. The similarity to Qt is no coincidence. Especially for the 0.8 release we have borrowed heavily concepts from Qt. If you start a qooxdoo project make sure you subscribe to the mailing list. Its our number one support channel.

]]>